A bitter High Court dispute has broken out amongst future neighbours around the development of a wall in a coastal web-site within a north Dublin suburb, a circumstance which includes attracted nationwide interest following an Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on the proposed loved ones residence at Sutton Strand, where by allegations of scheduling breaches, environmental problems, and lengthy-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in the courts. The Irish Moments posting about René Collier along with the Irish Times report about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as a local disagreement has progressed right into a extremely publicised legal battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above construction performs at the internet site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, exactly where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and a business director respectively, seek to develop their household house. The case happens to be emblematic of wider disputes together Eire’s coastline, exactly where development pressures collide with environmental protections as well as sensitivities of proven inhabitants. Based on the Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall becoming produced by their future neighbours goes outside of the boundaries permitted underneath organizing permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both equally citizens of Dublin Highway, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases in their arranging authorization by building a wall further than the boundaries of their website, bringing about an encroachment on the Specific Area of Conservation. The SAC designation is central for the dispute, as a result parts are topic to stringent controls beneath European and Irish environmental law. Inside their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minor encroachments might have Long lasting ecological outcomes, especially in the sensitive coastal surroundings including Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They can be in breach in their setting up permission, and say the wall, that is partly built, is in the correct place. Their legal crew has characterised the motion being an try to hold off or frustrate a lawful progress. The pair accuse litigants of trying to get to halt homebuilding in order to protect their look at, an allegation that has been repeated in court docket and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the heart of many coastal organizing disputes, where by views of the sea are both equally hugely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained spectacular efforts through the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by way of ocean in storm to photograph the website, In accordance with sworn evidence referenced from the Irish Periods. In a single account, Rene Collier waded as a result of midsection-significant water through a storm to photograph the site Irish Moments, a picture which has since turn out to be emblematic from the intensity in the dispute. These actions weren't merely symbolic; they were being meant to Acquire Visible proof of the wall’s posture relative to tidal strains and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location from the sea Irish Moments documented, describing how the two Adult males entered the water all through serious weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading through storm drinking water to photograph the website became Probably the most hanging descriptions to emerge from courtroom reporting. The Irish Instances write-up about accountant Paul Feely observed that these steps were being cited to reveal the plaintiffs’ belief the wall prolonged into a location impacted by tidal motion, strengthening their argument that the SAC was currently being encroached upon.
The functions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 had been lined in detail by the countrywide press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Situations 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Instances January 27 2026 turned greatly searched phrases as visitors sought to know the history and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court listened to further submissions on whether or not interim orders must be granted to halt development pending an entire hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a key moment inside the authorized timeline.
Within the core with the dispute can be a disagreement more than boundaries, setting up compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely maintain which the wall, as produced, goes outside of what was accredited and intrudes into shielded land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, has become referred to as meticulous in his assessment of scheduling files, maps, and problems hooked up to the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have equally stressed that their motion is motivated by concern for environmental safety and adherence to scheduling legislation. They reject promises that the case is about preserving A non-public view, insisting as an alternative that it's about guaranteeing that improvement at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they have got explained their very long-standing relationship to the realm as well as their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On the other aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as a couple just attempting to develop a relatives dwelling in accordance Using the legislation. They deny which the wall encroaches over a Distinctive Spot of Conservation and say that all will work are completed depending on Experienced guidance and accredited designs. Their lawyers have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the dramatic actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, like coming into The ocean through a storm, never alter the fundamental points.
The situation has also elevated broader questions on how arranging disputes are solved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute in excess of development of wall at coastal internet site has grown to be a shorthand description for your condition a large number of observers see as significantly popular. As sea degrees rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation between non-public land, community foreshore, and protected habitats is becoming extra contentious.
The Irish Situations short article about René Collier famous that the businessman experienced Formerly been involved in community advocacy on arranging and environmental concerns, although not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Instances article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how persons from quite various Qualified backgrounds can find by themselves aligned in this sort of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reports spell their names, became synonymous With all the Sutton Strand circumstance.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning from the sea Irish Moments protection emphasised, underlining René Collier waded through ocean in storm to photograph the site the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by waist-substantial h2o during a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Periods and René Collier waded by waist-high h2o during a storm to photograph the location Irish Instances are phrases that appeared regularly in protection, reflecting both the physical actuality on the coastline as well as symbolic mother nature of the act. For supporters in the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated dedication; for critics, they illustrated what they see as an extreme strategy.
Since the High Court proceedings continue on, the result stays uncertain. The courtroom need to establish if the wall as developed complies with arranging permission and irrespective of whether any encroachment right into a Particular Location of Conservation has happened. The legal arguments are complicated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal info, and preparing disorders. Nonetheless the human element stays central: neighbours who have to Dwell along with one another extended once the authorized expenditures happen to be paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over design is effective at the location on Dublin Road, Sutton, even so the implications of the situation prolong past that tackle. For planners, builders, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves like a reminder of the necessity of clarity in arranging permissions and sensitivity in coastal development. In addition it underscores how promptly an area disagreement can escalate when fundamental challenges which include environmental defense and house legal rights are perceived for being at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand continues to be an area of pure splendor and contested boundaries. The wall in the centre from the dispute stands partly created, a physical manifestation of unresolved legal thoughts. Whether it will in the long run be altered, removed, or accomplished as planned will rely on the courtroom’s findings. Till then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will probable proceed to appear in headlines, joined indelibly to one of the most carefully watched arranging disputes in north Dublin in recent times.